An official website of the United States government
A .mil website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
A lock (lock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Home : News : Article View
NEWS | Feb. 12, 2008

Commission: Invest in the National Guard

By Staff Sgt. Jim Greenhill National Guard Bureau

WASHINGTON - An independent commission has recommended changes for the National Guard and the five other reserve components to reflect their transformation from a strategic reserve to an operational force.

"At the core of these changes is the explicit recognition of the evolution of the reserve components from a purely strategic force, with lengthy mobilization times designed to meet Cold War threats from large nation-states, to an operational force," the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves (CNGR) wrote in a letter that accompanied the report to senators and congressmen on the Committee on Armed Services.

After two-and-a-half years of work, the commission delivered its final report to Congress, the Pentagon and other agencies Jan. 31, calling it the most comprehensive independent review in 60 years.

LTG H Steven Blum, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, said many elements of the CNGR report are valuable.

"This commission has made some very significant proposals, many of which have great merit, many of which actually validate some of the policies and the advancements that we have made in the Department of Defense in the last four years," Blum said during a press conference at the Pentagon Feb. 1 with Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for Homeland Defense.

The report has six broad conclusions and 95 recommendations based on 163 findings. The six broad conclusions:

  • Conclusion One: "The nation requires an operational reserve force. However, DoD and Congress have had no serious public discussion or debate on the matter, and have not formally adopted the operational reserve. Steps taken by DoD and Congress have been more reactive than proactive, more timid than bold, and more incremental than systemic. They thus far have not focused on an overarching set of alterations necessary to make the reserve components a ready, rotational force. Congress and DoD have not reformed the laws and policies governing the reserve components in ways that will sustain an operational force."
  • Conclusion Two: "The Department of Defense must be fully prepared to protect American lives and property in the homeland. DoD must improve its capabilities and readiness to play a primary role in the response to major catastrophes that incapacitate civilian government over a wide geographic area. This is a responsibility that is equal in priority to its combat responsibilities. As part of DoD, the National Guard and reserves should play the lead role in supporting the Department of Homeland Security, other federal agencies, and states in addressing these threats of equal or higher priority."
  • Conclusion Three: "Current law and policy still reflect a Cold War era vision of the employment of valuable military manpower assets and do not adequately support an operational 21st-century force. A new integrated personnel management structure is needed to provide trained and ready forces to meet mission requirements and to foster a continuum of service for the individual service member."
  • Conclusion Four: "The reserve components have responded to the call for service. Despite shortages in equipment, training, and personnel, they have once again proven their essential contribution to meeting national security requirements in a time of need. To sustain their service for the duration of the global war on terror will require maintaining the force at a new standard of readiness. Current policies cannot accomplish this task. A ready, capable, and accessible operational reserve will require an enduring commitment to invest in the readiness of the reserve components. This commitment will necessitate service integration, additional resources, and new constructs for employing the reserve components and for assessing readiness."
  • Conclusion Five: "To maintain an operational reserve force over the long term, DoD must appropriately support not only the service members themselves but also the two major influencers of members' decisions to remain in the military: their families and employers. Significant improvements in current programs in all three areas are essential to sustain an operational reserve force both today and in the future."
  • Conclusion Six: "The current reserve component structure does not meet the needs of an operational reserve force. Major changes in DoD organization, reserve component categories, and culture are needed to ensure that management of reserve and active component capabilities are integrated to maximize the effectiveness of the total force for both operational and strategic purposes."

Blum said that equipment shortages mentioned in Conclusion Four are improving because of "an unprecedented, historic commitment" by the President, Congress and the Secretaries of Defense, the Army and the Air Force.

In 2006, equipment readiness was at 40 percent, Blum said. In 2007, it was 49 percent. Today, it is 61 percent. A $45 billion taxpayer investment will increase it to 69 percent by the end of 2009 and 77 percent in the year 2013.

Blum gestured to a statue of the Minuteman, the symbol of the National Guard. The Minuteman holds a plow and a rifle, symbolizing Citizen-Soldiers' and -Airmen's ability to set down the plow and take up the rifle at a moment's notice in defense of the homeland or for an overseas mission.

"This is a tremendous success story of cooperation among our Congress, the White House, the departments and the end users, the National Guard," Blum said. "That Minuteman would smile if he knew that the leadership of this nation was devoting that kind of resources to him for the first time in history."

The National Guard's structural transformation to a mirror image of the active component combined with improved training, experience, commitment and recruiting success make it the most effective force it has ever been, Blum said.

More than 115 witnesses testified before the CNGR during 17 days of public hearings. Commission members also conducted more than 850 interviews with subject-matter experts and made site visits.

The full text of the final report of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves is available at: http://www.cngr.gov/

 

 

Related Articles
Maryland Army National Guard Soldiers from 1st Battalion, 175th Infantry Battalion and paramedics from Old Town Fire Station push an ambulance out of the snow in Baltimore, Jan. 25, 2026. At the direction of Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, about 160 personnel of the Maryland National Guard activated to support civil authorities with specialized vehicles across the state to ensure rapid response capabilities for communities that may require assistance during inclement weather conditions. Photo by Staff Sgt. Lindiwe Henry.
National Guard Members Respond to Winter Weather in 15 States
By Sgt. 1st Class Christy Sherman, | Jan. 26, 2026
ARLINGTON, Va. – More than 5,400 National Guard members are on duty in 15 states in the aftermath of winter storms that dropped snow and ice from the Midwest to the Mid-Atlantic and the South over the weekend.“[I’m] proud of...

U.S. Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tim Englund, a master spur holder assigned to the 303rd Cavalry Regiment, Washington National Guard, inspects a gold spur during a ceremony at Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti, Jan. 9, 2026. Englund has earned both silver and gold spurs and has helped facilitate multiple Spur Rides throughout his career. Photo by Sgt. 1st Class Kenneth Tucceri.
Washington, Oregon Guard Soldiers Inducted Into the Order of the Spur
By Sgt. Vivian Ainomugisha, | Jan. 26, 2026
CAMP LEMMONIER, Djibouti – Soldiers from the Washington Army National Guard, including those assigned to the 303rd Cavalry Regiment and the 81st Brigade, along with attached Soldiers from the Oregon National Guard, were...

Florida Army National Guard Soldiers assigned to Troop A and C Troop, 1st Squadron, 153rd Cavalry Regiment, including liaison monitoring teams and Religious Support Team chaplains, train alongside Tennessee Army National Guard Forward Support Medical Platoon (MEDEVAC), General Support Aviation Battalion aircrews and Florida Army National Guard 715th Military Police Company during civil disturbance response, leader engagements and joint air-ground operations Jan. 16, 2026, during a culminating training exercise at Fort Hood, Texas. The exercise highlighted total force integration as cavalry, medical, military police and religious support elements synchronized mobility, crowd management, escalation control and partner engagement to provide real-time situational awareness and achieve mission success in complex environments. Photo by Staff Sgt. Seth LaCount)
National Guard Multi-State Task Force Completes Training Exercise
By Capt. Balinda ONeal, | Jan. 26, 2026
FORT HOOD, Texas – Soldiers assigned to Task Force Gator, a multi-state National Guard formation, completed a Culminating Training Event from Jan. 12–17, marking a key milestone in the task force’s preparation for an upcoming...